The newly unveiled F-47 fighter jet program by Boeing, initiated under the Trump administration, is facing criticism and questions regarding its cost, necessity, and potential impact on other defense priorities as of April 2025. Concerns arise from the program's accelerated approval and potential parallels with the F-35's cost overruns.

Boeing secured a $20 billion contract to develop the F-47, also known as Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) fighter. The decision was made despite existing doubts from Air Force officials about investing in another manned fighter program. Former Secretary of the Air Force, Frank Kendall, deferred the NGAD decision, indicating uncertainty whether this aircraft aligns with the nation's defense strategy, budget constraints, and higher priorities.

President Trump, during the contract award ceremony in March, lauded the agreement. However, critics draw comparisons to the F-35's troubled history.

Acquisition costs doubled since the initial projection made in 2001. Total program price is nearing $2 trillion, with ongoing engineering challenges. This raises concerns about potential parallels with the F-35 program's cost overruns and developmental issues.

Experts suggest that Congress will likely examine the F-47's justification, affordability, and potential impact on other critical defense initiatives in the upcoming months. The program's future hinges on addressing these concerns and demonstrating its value within the broader defense strategy.